<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for 21st century actuary's blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.actuary21c.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.actuary21c.com</link>
	<description>one actuary trying to make the most of 21st Century technology and thinking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 11:49:33 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reducing environmental costs in the new UK actuarial profession by Brian Spence</title>
		<link>http://www.actuary21c.com/?p=1167&#038;cpage=1#comment-1714</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Spence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 11:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actuary21c.com/?p=1167#comment-1714</guid>
		<description>Completely agree with you Patrick.  Really wonder what the benefit is of the paper version of the Actuary.  Brian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Completely agree with you Patrick.  Really wonder what the benefit is of the paper version of the Actuary.  Brian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Has anyone ever found Microsoft&#8217;s ReadyBoost facility for Windows Vista (or Windows 7) of any use? I haven&#8217;t by Calum</title>
		<link>http://www.actuary21c.com/?p=1156&#038;cpage=1#comment-1683</link>
		<dc:creator>Calum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 21:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actuary21c.com/?p=1156#comment-1683</guid>
		<description>Given the nature of your computing work, the chances are you have large amounts of installed memory.  Since unused memory is (presumably) used as disk cache anyway, you probably aren&#039;t seeing much gain with it.  And of course, if the tasks you are undertaking are not bounded by disk I/O, then it will have no effect whatsoever.  For example, R stores datasets in memory unless size forces caching.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the nature of your computing work, the chances are you have large amounts of installed memory.  Since unused memory is (presumably) used as disk cache anyway, you probably aren&#8217;t seeing much gain with it.  And of course, if the tasks you are undertaking are not bounded by disk I/O, then it will have no effect whatsoever.  For example, R stores datasets in memory unless size forces caching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Actuary magazine: surely the future is online? by Reducing environmental costs in the new UK actuarial profession &#124; 21st century actuary&#8217;s blog</title>
		<link>http://www.actuary21c.com/?p=65&#038;cpage=1#comment-1675</link>
		<dc:creator>Reducing environmental costs in the new UK actuarial profession &#124; 21st century actuary&#8217;s blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 18:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actuary21c.com/?p=65#comment-1675</guid>
		<description>[...] last wrote about this over a year ago (here, since when some progress has been made but not yet on the main issue I was focussing on which was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] last wrote about this over a year ago (here, since when some progress has been made but not yet on the main issue I was focussing on which was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My review of Microsoft Windows 7 v Vista and Office 2007 v Office 2003 by actuary21c</title>
		<link>http://www.actuary21c.com/?p=1134&#038;cpage=1#comment-1655</link>
		<dc:creator>actuary21c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actuary21c.com/?p=1134#comment-1655</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just updated the post to mention another small but important improvement in Windows 7 as compared to Vista: the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.inqa.com/index.php?set_albumName=Windows7&amp;id=RecentPlaces_AtLast&amp;option=com_gallery&amp;Itemid=26&amp;include=view_photo.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Recent Places&lt;/a&gt; link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just updated the post to mention another small but important improvement in Windows 7 as compared to Vista: the <a href="http://www.inqa.com/index.php?set_albumName=Windows7&#038;id=RecentPlaces_AtLast&#038;option=com_gallery&#038;Itemid=26&#038;include=view_photo.php" rel="nofollow">Recent Places</a> link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I now support the 2010 merger proposals, my remaining objection having been removed, plus better member communication facility introduced by actuary21c</title>
		<link>http://www.actuary21c.com/?p=1124&#038;cpage=1#comment-1520</link>
		<dc:creator>actuary21c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 22:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actuary21c.com/?p=1124#comment-1520</guid>
		<description>PS Having just voted online FOR the 2010 merger proposals, the following message appeared after I had clicked the Submit button on the Electoral Reform Services (ERS) website:

&quot;If you have made an error/want to alter your vote to please contact ERS on +44 (0)20 8889 9203 or onlinevoting@electoralreform.co.uk.&quot;

So, as during the 2009 merger process, it is possible -although there is not much time left (electronic voting closes at 1700 on 22 May 2010 for Faculty members, and 1700 on 23 May 2010 for Institute members) - for anyone who wishes to change their vote to do so.

Patrick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS Having just voted online FOR the 2010 merger proposals, the following message appeared after I had clicked the Submit button on the Electoral Reform Services (ERS) website:</p>
<p>&#8220;If you have made an error/want to alter your vote to please contact ERS on +44 (0)20 8889 9203 or <a href="mailto:onlinevoting@electoralreform.co.uk">onlinevoting@electoralreform.co.uk</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>So, as during the 2009 merger process, it is possible -although there is not much time left (electronic voting closes at 1700 on 22 May 2010 for Faculty members, and 1700 on 23 May 2010 for Institute members) &#8211; for anyone who wishes to change their vote to do so.</p>
<p>Patrick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using a COM-visible .NET dll across a network from VBA by actuary21c</title>
		<link>http://www.actuary21c.com/?p=1116&#038;cpage=1#comment-1519</link>
		<dc:creator>actuary21c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 12:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actuary21c.com/?p=1116#comment-1519</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re welcome, Mike.   If I had my way, Microsoft would have much better error messages so that a lot of this searching around on the web wouldn&#039;t be necessary.  Having said that, the error messages in .net are much better than those from COM, but are still not perfect, e.g. the standard Dictionary class in .net still gives error messages like &quot;an element with this key has already been added&quot; which could be much improved by actually providing the key, e.g. &quot;an element with key &quot;Smith&quot; has already been added&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re welcome, Mike.   If I had my way, Microsoft would have much better error messages so that a lot of this searching around on the web wouldn&#8217;t be necessary.  Having said that, the error messages in .net are much better than those from COM, but are still not perfect, e.g. the standard Dictionary class in .net still gives error messages like &#8220;an element with this key has already been added&#8221; which could be much improved by actually providing the key, e.g. &#8220;an element with key &#8220;Smith&#8221; has already been added&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using a COM-visible .NET dll across a network from VBA by Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.actuary21c.com/?p=1116&#038;cpage=1#comment-1515</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 00:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actuary21c.com/?p=1116#comment-1515</guid>
		<description>Spent half a day on the phone with a client until we found this.  Works great.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spent half a day on the phone with a client until we found this.  Works great.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by Official 2010 merger plans (for Institute and Faculty of Actuaries) &#171; 21st century actuary&#8217;s blog</title>
		<link>http://www.actuary21c.com/?page_id=2&#038;cpage=1#comment-1227</link>
		<dc:creator>Official 2010 merger plans (for Institute and Faculty of Actuaries) &#171; 21st century actuary&#8217;s blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 17:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actuary21c.com/?page_id=2#comment-1227</guid>
		<description>[...] If anyone wants to comment but is reluctant to do so publicly, then you can email me (see the About page on this blog).   Comments [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If anyone wants to comment but is reluctant to do so publicly, then you can email me (see the About page on this blog).   Comments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Further Comments by David Wilkie on the proposed Charter for the “CAP” by Revised draft charter proposed for 2010 Institute/Faculty merger vote &#171; 21st century actuary&#8217;s blog</title>
		<link>http://www.actuary21c.com/?p=517&#038;cpage=1#comment-1139</link>
		<dc:creator>Revised draft charter proposed for 2010 Institute/Faculty merger vote &#171; 21st century actuary&#8217;s blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 21:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actuary21c.com/?p=517#comment-1139</guid>
		<description>[...] rights are still (as they undoubtedly were under the previous failed July 2009 proposed charter, see here and related posts) being significantly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rights are still (as they undoubtedly were under the previous failed July 2009 proposed charter, see here and related posts) being significantly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on US actuaries&#8217; experience shows Actuarial Outpost = the Google of actuarial forums by Twitter and the Actuarial Outpost: why actuaries should be interested in these and some tips &#171; 21st century actuary&#8217;s blog</title>
		<link>http://www.actuary21c.com/?p=1023&#038;cpage=1#comment-1086</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter and the Actuarial Outpost: why actuaries should be interested in these and some tips &#171; 21st century actuary&#8217;s blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 22:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.actuary21c.com/?p=1023#comment-1086</guid>
		<description>[...] am also finding the Actuarial Outpost (AO) increasingly useful &#8211; as stated in this previous post it really is the 500 pound gorilla in the world of actuarial discussion [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] am also finding the Actuarial Outpost (AO) increasingly useful &#8211; as stated in this previous post it really is the 500 pound gorilla in the world of actuarial discussion [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
